<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 315 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101593</link>
    <description>The court found Kuldip Raj Narang guilty under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956, for failing to file the statement of affairs and imposed a fine on him. Mokan Singh was acquitted as he was not a director at the relevant time. The judgment underscores the collective responsibility of the board of directors in managing the company&#039;s affairs and maintaining statutory records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:59:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 315 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101593</link>
      <description>The court found Kuldip Raj Narang guilty under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956, for failing to file the statement of affairs and imposed a fine on him. Mokan Singh was acquitted as he was not a director at the relevant time. The judgment underscores the collective responsibility of the board of directors in managing the company&#039;s affairs and maintaining statutory records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>