https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101588 An order under the relevant capacity determination scheme had to be passed by the Commissioner as the designated authority; an order issued by the Superintendent was therefore not a valid final order. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the appellant's own matter and held that the defect in the impugned order required it to be set aside. The matter also had to be reconsidered by the competent authority after compliance with the principles of natural justice, so it was remanded to the Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad for fresh decision. en-us Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:56:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101588 An order under the relevant capacity determination scheme had to be passed by the Commissioner as the designated authority; an order issued by the Superintendent was therefore not a valid final order. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the appellant's own matter and held that the defect in the impugned order required it to be set aside. The matter also had to be reconsidered by the competent authority after compliance with the principles of natural justice, so it was remanded to the Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad for fresh decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101588