https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101577 A foreign national could continue to hold immovable property in India acquired before the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act only if the section 31 declaration requirement was complied with; non-compliance meant the property could not be treated as lawfully held for the purposes of relief. The Court also treated temporary injunction as unavailable where the claimant was not in actual possession of the suit property and had not sought restoration of possession, since possessory relief under the Specific Relief Act depends on possession or a prayer to recover it. On both grounds, the refusal of injunction was sustained. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:41:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101577 A foreign national could continue to hold immovable property in India acquired before the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act only if the section 31 declaration requirement was complied with; non-compliance meant the property could not be treated as lawfully held for the purposes of relief. The Court also treated temporary injunction as unavailable where the claimant was not in actual possession of the suit property and had not sought restoration of possession, since possessory relief under the Specific Relief Act depends on possession or a prayer to recover it. On both grounds, the refusal of injunction was sustained. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 22 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101577