https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101565 The court upheld the validity of the Regional Director's order under Section 108(1D) of the Companies Act, stating that the principles of natural justice were not applicable in this context. The Company Law Board's refusal to entertain the review application was justified, as the Regional Director's power was discretionary without appeal provisions. The dismissal of the application under Section 155 for rectification of the register of members was upheld, emphasizing that complex disputes should be resolved in civil courts rather than through summary proceedings. The writ petition and special appeal were dismissed with costs. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101565 The court upheld the validity of the Regional Director's order under Section 108(1D) of the Companies Act, stating that the principles of natural justice were not applicable in this context. The Company Law Board's refusal to entertain the review application was justified, as the Regional Director's power was discretionary without appeal provisions. The dismissal of the application under Section 155 for rectification of the register of members was upheld, emphasizing that complex disputes should be resolved in civil courts rather than through summary proceedings. The writ petition and special appeal were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101565