<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (2) TMI 104 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101553</link>
    <description>The Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was construed to allow assessment of a dissolved firm for tax liabilities arising from transactions completed before dissolution. The Court applied its earlier majority view and read sections 18 and 19(3) as showing that dissolution does not defeat assessment of pre-dissolution liabilities. On that basis, the notice issued under section 33 for the relevant period was within power, and the challenge to the assessment notice failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (2) TMI 104 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101553</link>
      <description>The Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was construed to allow assessment of a dissolved firm for tax liabilities arising from transactions completed before dissolution. The Court applied its earlier majority view and read sections 18 and 19(3) as showing that dissolution does not defeat assessment of pre-dissolution liabilities. On that basis, the notice issued under section 33 for the relevant period was within power, and the challenge to the assessment notice failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>