<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 275 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101541</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner could not claim shares in Messrs. Harrisons Malayalam Ltd. even if they had obtained shares of Messrs. Harrisons and Crosfield (UK) Ltd. Therefore, the court did not rectify the share register of the first respondent under Section 155 of the Companies Act, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 275 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101541</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner could not claim shares in Messrs. Harrisons Malayalam Ltd. even if they had obtained shares of Messrs. Harrisons and Crosfield (UK) Ltd. Therefore, the court did not rectify the share register of the first respondent under Section 155 of the Companies Act, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>