https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101523 Whether s.630 of the Companies Act applies to former officers/employees: Court held that where property is company-owned and occupied by virtue of employment, upon termination the occupant cannot assert tenancy; subsections (1) and (2) of s.630 therefore apply to past officers, permitting criminal proceedings and recovery by process. Outcome: criminal court had jurisdiction and issuance of process was valid. Whether interference under Art.227 or s.482 CrPC was warranted: on the facts and precedent, exercise of supervisory jurisdiction was inappropriate and the petition lacked merit. Outcome: petition dismissed; limited stay of three weeks granted to enable filing before SC. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101523 Whether s.630 of the Companies Act applies to former officers/employees: Court held that where property is company-owned and occupied by virtue of employment, upon termination the occupant cannot assert tenancy; subsections (1) and (2) of s.630 therefore apply to past officers, permitting criminal proceedings and recovery by process. Outcome: criminal court had jurisdiction and issuance of process was valid. Whether interference under Art.227 or s.482 CrPC was warranted: on the facts and precedent, exercise of supervisory jurisdiction was inappropriate and the petition lacked merit. Outcome: petition dismissed; limited stay of three weeks granted to enable filing before SC. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101523