<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 500 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101517</link>
    <description>At the admission stage of a contributory&#039;s winding-up petition, the court must first find prima facie grounds before directing advertisement, because publication can materially affect the company&#039;s business and reputation. A winding-up petition remains a last resort, and the court must weigh the interests of the company, shareholders, and the wider consequences. The availability of alternative remedies for oppression, mismanagement, or removal of directors is relevant but not conclusive. On the stated facts, non-commencement of business, cost escalation, failure to secure finance, audit irregularities, and no realistic prospect of revival supported admission, and the petition was properly advertised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:36:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 500 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101517</link>
      <description>At the admission stage of a contributory&#039;s winding-up petition, the court must first find prima facie grounds before directing advertisement, because publication can materially affect the company&#039;s business and reputation. A winding-up petition remains a last resort, and the court must weigh the interests of the company, shareholders, and the wider consequences. The availability of alternative remedies for oppression, mismanagement, or removal of directors is relevant but not conclusive. On the stated facts, non-commencement of business, cost escalation, failure to secure finance, audit irregularities, and no realistic prospect of revival supported admission, and the petition was properly advertised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>