<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 342 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101504</link>
    <description>Failure to file annual returns and balance-sheets within the prescribed time was treated as a completed statutory default, not a continuing offence. A continuing offence requires a breach that persists from day to day until compliance; the court held that the omission here ended when the filing period expired. The enhanced penalty under the Companies Act was regarded as a compliance measure, not a factor that turned the original default into a continuing breach. As a result, limitation under section 468 CrPC ran from the date of expiry of the filing period, and delayed cognizance of the complaints was barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:54:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 342 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101504</link>
      <description>Failure to file annual returns and balance-sheets within the prescribed time was treated as a completed statutory default, not a continuing offence. A continuing offence requires a breach that persists from day to day until compliance; the court held that the omission here ended when the filing period expired. The enhanced penalty under the Companies Act was regarded as a compliance measure, not a factor that turned the original default into a continuing breach. As a result, limitation under section 468 CrPC ran from the date of expiry of the filing period, and delayed cognizance of the complaints was barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>