<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 397 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101485</link>
    <description>Section 23(3) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 exempted the proposed amalgamation where the statutory conditions were satisfied on the facts. The Bombay High Court held that the exemption could not be denied merely because the companies were not shown to be engaged predominantly in services, since they were carrying on the same business and the relevant conditions for exemption were met. No separate application under the Act was therefore required for the amalgamation, and the petitions succeeded with approval of the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 397 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101485</link>
      <description>Section 23(3) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 exempted the proposed amalgamation where the statutory conditions were satisfied on the facts. The Bombay High Court held that the exemption could not be denied merely because the companies were not shown to be engaged predominantly in services, since they were carrying on the same business and the relevant conditions for exemption were met. No separate application under the Act was therefore required for the amalgamation, and the petitions succeeded with approval of the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>