<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 609 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed remand where additional claims on exemption for clearances to job workers and on the amended penalty provision had not been examined by the lower authorities. Because duty and penalty were already being reworked, it held that the original authority should also consider these submissions and afford the appellants a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration of the exemption and reduced-penalty issues together with the issues already directed to be reconsidered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:15:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 609 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed remand where additional claims on exemption for clearances to job workers and on the amended penalty provision had not been examined by the lower authorities. Because duty and penalty were already being reworked, it held that the original authority should also consider these submissions and afford the appellants a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration of the exemption and reduced-penalty issues together with the issues already directed to be reconsidered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>