<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 300 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101465</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the writ petition, ruling that the Company Law Board&#039;s order directing an investigation into the petitioner-company&#039;s affairs was arbitrary and lacked a reasonable basis. The court found the order was not based on sufficient material and lacked a reasonable basis, striking down the impugned order and making the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:01:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 300 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101465</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the writ petition, ruling that the Company Law Board&#039;s order directing an investigation into the petitioner-company&#039;s affairs was arbitrary and lacked a reasonable basis. The court found the order was not based on sufficient material and lacked a reasonable basis, striking down the impugned order and making the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>