<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 122 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101461</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the contract for the supply and installation of rolling shutters constituted a works contract, not a sale of goods. The shutters, being permanent fixtures, were fabricated, transported, and installed as integral parts of the building. The Court emphasized the indivisibility of the contract, involving both materials and labor for a lump sum, and ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and awarding costs to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 14:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 122 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101461</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the contract for the supply and installation of rolling shutters constituted a works contract, not a sale of goods. The shutters, being permanent fixtures, were fabricated, transported, and installed as integral parts of the building. The Court emphasized the indivisibility of the contract, involving both materials and labor for a lump sum, and ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and awarding costs to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>