<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 590 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101457</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 35/95-C.E. for texturised yarn made from duty-paid yarn was examined only on a prima facie basis. The record indicates that the exemption was considered unavailable because the yarn was cleared from the factory in texturised form, and on that footing complete waiver of the confirmed duty demand was refused; the appellant was directed to pre-deposit the entire duty amount for the stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:53:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 590 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101457</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 35/95-C.E. for texturised yarn made from duty-paid yarn was examined only on a prima facie basis. The record indicates that the exemption was considered unavailable because the yarn was cleared from the factory in texturised form, and on that footing complete waiver of the confirmed duty demand was refused; the appellant was directed to pre-deposit the entire duty amount for the stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>