<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 575 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101442</link>
    <description>Dhanzyme was treated as classifiable under sub-heading 3101.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as a plant growth promoter and bio-fertiliser. The text notes that the classification issue had already been settled in an earlier Tribunal decision involving the same product, and that prior view was followed because no distinguishing feature was shown. The operative principle is that an established classification for the same product should be applied consistently where the facts and product description remain unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 575 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101442</link>
      <description>Dhanzyme was treated as classifiable under sub-heading 3101.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as a plant growth promoter and bio-fertiliser. The text notes that the classification issue had already been settled in an earlier Tribunal decision involving the same product, and that prior view was followed because no distinguishing feature was shown. The operative principle is that an established classification for the same product should be applied consistently where the facts and product description remain unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>