<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 563 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101430</link>
    <description>Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 permits redemption fine in lieu of confiscation, but it does not authorise imposition of penalty. On that construction, the penalty component imposed under that provision was held unsustainable and was set aside. The appeal was allowed to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:19:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 563 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101430</link>
      <description>Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 permits redemption fine in lieu of confiscation, but it does not authorise imposition of penalty. On that construction, the penalty component imposed under that provision was held unsustainable and was set aside. The appeal was allowed to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>