https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101422 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, rejecting the respondents' objections. It held that the petitioners, as legal representatives of the deceased shareholder, were eligible to file the petition under Section 439(4) of the Companies Act, 1956. Additionally, the court affirmed its jurisdiction to explore alternatives to winding up, such as ordering the purchase of shares under Sections 443(1)(d) and 443(2) of the Companies Act. The petition was not dismissed, and the court scheduled a hearing for January 29, 1986. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:09:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101422 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, rejecting the respondents' objections. It held that the petitioners, as legal representatives of the deceased shareholder, were eligible to file the petition under Section 439(4) of the Companies Act, 1956. Additionally, the court affirmed its jurisdiction to explore alternatives to winding up, such as ordering the purchase of shares under Sections 443(1)(d) and 443(2) of the Companies Act. The petition was not dismissed, and the court scheduled a hearing for January 29, 1986. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 05 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101422