https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101421 Territorial jurisdiction under section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure depends on the defendants' residence or business location, or on where the cause of action wholly or partly arises. A company's winding-up at Hyderabad and the presence of the official liquidator there did not alter the company's registered and business location at Karimnagar. Leave to sue under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 merely permitted institution of the suit and did not itself create a cause of action or confer territorial jurisdiction. The winding-up proceedings at Hyderabad were separate statutory proceedings and could not be treated as part of the cause of action for the money suit. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:07:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101421 Territorial jurisdiction under section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure depends on the defendants' residence or business location, or on where the cause of action wholly or partly arises. A company's winding-up at Hyderabad and the presence of the official liquidator there did not alter the company's registered and business location at Karimnagar. Leave to sue under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 merely permitted institution of the suit and did not itself create a cause of action or confer territorial jurisdiction. The winding-up proceedings at Hyderabad were separate statutory proceedings and could not be treated as part of the cause of action for the money suit. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 21 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101421