<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 755 - CEGAT, NNEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101401</link>
    <description>Interest demanded under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act was held not to fall within the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F, which refers only to duty demanded and penalty imposed. In the absence of any express statutory inclusion of interest within that provision, pre-deposit of the interest amount was not a condition for hearing the appeal. The waiver request was therefore justified, and stay of the interest demand was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:26:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 755 - CEGAT, NNEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101401</link>
      <description>Interest demanded under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act was held not to fall within the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F, which refers only to duty demanded and penalty imposed. In the absence of any express statutory inclusion of interest within that provision, pre-deposit of the interest amount was not a condition for hearing the appeal. The waiver request was therefore justified, and stay of the interest demand was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>