<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 330 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101398</link>
    <description>The company&#039;s prolonged cessation of business, absence of proper accounts and balance-sheets, unpaid statutory and operational liabilities, and the unavailability of responsible officers indicated prima facie commercial insolvency. The court also found special circumstances requiring immediate protective action because the company&#039;s assets were exposed to theft, deterioration, and neglect, while the reply did not effectively meet the material allegations. On that basis, the court held that there was a continuing stalemate in the company&#039;s management and affairs and that appointment of a provisional liquidator was necessary pending final disposal of the winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 330 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101398</link>
      <description>The company&#039;s prolonged cessation of business, absence of proper accounts and balance-sheets, unpaid statutory and operational liabilities, and the unavailability of responsible officers indicated prima facie commercial insolvency. The court also found special circumstances requiring immediate protective action because the company&#039;s assets were exposed to theft, deterioration, and neglect, while the reply did not effectively meet the material allegations. On that basis, the court held that there was a continuing stalemate in the company&#039;s management and affairs and that appointment of a provisional liquidator was necessary pending final disposal of the winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>