<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 303 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101391</link>
    <description>The court held that a director of a company cannot be held personally liable for the company&#039;s dues under State and Central Sales Tax laws unless specific legal provisions exist to establish such liability. The lower courts&#039; denial of an interim injunction against the director was found to be based on a misconception of the law, leading to the reversal of the decision and the granting of the injunction in favor of the director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 303 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101391</link>
      <description>The court held that a director of a company cannot be held personally liable for the company&#039;s dues under State and Central Sales Tax laws unless specific legal provisions exist to establish such liability. The lower courts&#039; denial of an interim injunction against the director was found to be based on a misconception of the law, leading to the reversal of the decision and the granting of the injunction in favor of the director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>