<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 750 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101386</link>
    <description>Additional excise duty on captively consumed HDPE/PP tapes was treated as dependent on the basic excise duty chargeable on the goods. Because Notification No. 67/95-C.E. granted full exemption from basic excise duty on the captively consumed goods, the base duty became nil. As the additional duty under the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 is calculated as a percentage of excise duty chargeable, no additional excise duty could arise where the basic duty itself was nil. The notification was also treated as outside the exclusion in Section 3, with the result that the additional duty was not payable and the show cause proceedings were to be dropped.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 750 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101386</link>
      <description>Additional excise duty on captively consumed HDPE/PP tapes was treated as dependent on the basic excise duty chargeable on the goods. Because Notification No. 67/95-C.E. granted full exemption from basic excise duty on the captively consumed goods, the base duty became nil. As the additional duty under the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 is calculated as a percentage of excise duty chargeable, no additional excise duty could arise where the basic duty itself was nil. The notification was also treated as outside the exclusion in Section 3, with the result that the additional duty was not payable and the show cause proceedings were to be dropped.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>