<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 164 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101383</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India applied the true-nature test to determine sales tax liability on photographic prints. A transaction is a sale only where its main object is the transfer of property in a chattel as chattel; where the dominant purpose is the exercise of skill and labour, the use of materials and incidental passing of property does not convert it into a sale. Photographic work was held to be principally a service involving skill and labour, with delivery of prints merely ancillary. The supply of photoprints was therefore treated as a contract of work and labour and not a sale of goods, so sales tax was not attracted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 164 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101383</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India applied the true-nature test to determine sales tax liability on photographic prints. A transaction is a sale only where its main object is the transfer of property in a chattel as chattel; where the dominant purpose is the exercise of skill and labour, the use of materials and incidental passing of property does not convert it into a sale. Photographic work was held to be principally a service involving skill and labour, with delivery of prints merely ancillary. The supply of photoprints was therefore treated as a contract of work and labour and not a sale of goods, so sales tax was not attracted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>