https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101372 The tribunal found that the admission of evasion of central excise duty by individuals associated with the appellants weakened their case. Despite arguments for lack of concrete evidence and violation of natural justice, the tribunal held that the appellants failed to establish a strong prima facie case. Considering the financial position of the appellants, they were directed to make significant pre-deposits by specified dates, failing which their appeals would be dismissed under Section 35F of the Act. Compliance reporting deadlines were set to monitor adherence to the order. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:41:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101372 The tribunal found that the admission of evasion of central excise duty by individuals associated with the appellants weakened their case. Despite arguments for lack of concrete evidence and violation of natural justice, the tribunal held that the appellants failed to establish a strong prima facie case. Considering the financial position of the appellants, they were directed to make significant pre-deposits by specified dates, failing which their appeals would be dismissed under Section 35F of the Act. Compliance reporting deadlines were set to monitor adherence to the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101372