<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 729 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101359</link>
    <description>For valuation under Section 4A, retail sale price may be declared either on the package itself or by a label securely affixed to it under Rule 6 of the Standards of Weights &amp; Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. A revised MRP shown by an affixed sticker can supersede the earlier printed price, so the package is not treated as carrying two operative retail sale prices merely because the original print remains visible. Where verification does not establish a false invoiced MRP or insecure affixation of labels, the basis for invoking Explanation 2 to Section 4A is absent, and the duty demand and penalty are unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 729 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101359</link>
      <description>For valuation under Section 4A, retail sale price may be declared either on the package itself or by a label securely affixed to it under Rule 6 of the Standards of Weights &amp; Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. A revised MRP shown by an affixed sticker can supersede the earlier printed price, so the package is not treated as carrying two operative retail sale prices merely because the original print remains visible. Where verification does not establish a false invoiced MRP or insecure affixation of labels, the basis for invoking Explanation 2 to Section 4A is absent, and the duty demand and penalty are unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>