https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101343 The court held that the offense of non-compliance with rule 10 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, is a continuing one until the required return is filed, rejecting the limitation argument raised by the petitioners. The judgment emphasized the importance of fulfilling filing requirements under the Companies Act, 1956, and allowed legal proceedings to proceed despite the passage of the limitation period. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:53:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101343 The court held that the offense of non-compliance with rule 10 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, is a continuing one until the required return is filed, rejecting the limitation argument raised by the petitioners. The judgment emphasized the importance of fulfilling filing requirements under the Companies Act, 1956, and allowed legal proceedings to proceed despite the passage of the limitation period. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101343