<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 709 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101339</link>
    <description>Enhancement of redemption fine and penalty for confiscated imported betel nuts requires contemporaneous evidence of a higher prevailing market value. Where the goods were liable to confiscation for violation of import policy, but the Revenue produced no evidence of higher import or sale prices and relied only on a general assertion that prices were higher elsewhere in the country, no legal basis existed to raise the assessed value or increase the consequential fine and penalty. The request for enhancement was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:58:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 709 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101339</link>
      <description>Enhancement of redemption fine and penalty for confiscated imported betel nuts requires contemporaneous evidence of a higher prevailing market value. Where the goods were liable to confiscation for violation of import policy, but the Revenue produced no evidence of higher import or sale prices and relied only on a general assertion that prices were higher elsewhere in the country, no legal basis existed to raise the assessed value or increase the consequential fine and penalty. The request for enhancement was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>