<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 198 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101326</link>
    <description>Agreements permitting entry to cut and remove forest produce were treated as licences, not leases, because they created no estate or interest in land, gave no exclusive possession, and only allowed ancillary use of the land; stamp duty as a lease was therefore not chargeable. Annual auctions of forest produce did not amount to a business of sale, as the transactions lacked the frequency and regularity required to make the Government a dealer; sales tax was therefore not payable on the bid amounts. Security deposits retained under the auction conditions did not create any right in specified property and were not mortgages; stamp duty on that basis was therefore not payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 198 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101326</link>
      <description>Agreements permitting entry to cut and remove forest produce were treated as licences, not leases, because they created no estate or interest in land, gave no exclusive possession, and only allowed ancillary use of the land; stamp duty as a lease was therefore not chargeable. Annual auctions of forest produce did not amount to a business of sale, as the transactions lacked the frequency and regularity required to make the Government a dealer; sales tax was therefore not payable on the bid amounts. Security deposits retained under the auction conditions did not create any right in specified property and were not mortgages; stamp duty on that basis was therefore not payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>