https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101325 Where a complaint alleges contravention by a company and specifically attributes responsibility to officers or directors in default, prosecution of those officers is maintainable even if the company is not separately arraigned, and the proceedings were not liable to be quashed for non-joinder. The limitation objection also failed because the offence carried a punishment extending beyond the Criminal Procedure Code limitation thresholds, and the shorter period under the Rules did not govern. On that basis, a complaint filed after discovery of the contravention was not time-barred, and the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:35:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101325 Where a complaint alleges contravention by a company and specifically attributes responsibility to officers or directors in default, prosecution of those officers is maintainable even if the company is not separately arraigned, and the proceedings were not liable to be quashed for non-joinder. The limitation objection also failed because the offence carried a punishment extending beyond the Criminal Procedure Code limitation thresholds, and the shorter period under the Rules did not govern. On that basis, a complaint filed after discovery of the contravention was not time-barred, and the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101325