<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 692 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning the valuation of imported machineries back to the Commissioner due to inconsistencies in valuation methods. The Commissioner&#039;s orders for confiscation and penalties based on alleged under-valuation were challenged, with the appellant arguing for acceptance of SGS valuation. The Commissioner&#039;s varying approaches to valuation, including rejecting manufacturer&#039;s values and applying different depreciation methods, were criticized. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of the valuation issue in line with the Apex Court judgment on second-hand machinery valuation, setting aside the original order for revaluation based on the correct principles outlined in the Eicher Motors Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 692 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning the valuation of imported machineries back to the Commissioner due to inconsistencies in valuation methods. The Commissioner&#039;s orders for confiscation and penalties based on alleged under-valuation were challenged, with the appellant arguing for acceptance of SGS valuation. The Commissioner&#039;s varying approaches to valuation, including rejecting manufacturer&#039;s values and applying different depreciation methods, were criticized. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of the valuation issue in line with the Apex Court judgment on second-hand machinery valuation, setting aside the original order for revaluation based on the correct principles outlined in the Eicher Motors Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>