https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101316 A company petition under sections 397 and 398 was required to comply with the representative threshold in section 399 when filed by a member authorised under section 399(4). The authorised member could initiate the petition only within the scope of that authorisation and with the written consents required by section 399(3) for the persons on whose behalf it was made. Strangers not covered by the original authorisation could not be added as supporting petitioners, and absence of the necessary consents rendered the petition not maintainable. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:19:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101316 A company petition under sections 397 and 398 was required to comply with the representative threshold in section 399 when filed by a member authorised under section 399(4). The authorised member could initiate the petition only within the scope of that authorisation and with the written consents required by section 399(3) for the persons on whose behalf it was made. Strangers not covered by the original authorisation could not be added as supporting petitioners, and absence of the necessary consents rendered the petition not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 21 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101316