<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 682 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101314</link>
    <description>A unit holding provisional registration under the State SSI authorities could claim small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. where no applicable later clarification had withdrawn that benefit in the relevant jurisdiction. Trade notices issued pursuant to Board instructions were treated as supporting exemption on provisional SSI registration, and a later clarification relied on by Revenue could not be applied without showing that it governed the unit&#039;s State. The cited decisions were followed to confirm eligibility based on provisional registration, and the Revenue&#039;s objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 682 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101314</link>
      <description>A unit holding provisional registration under the State SSI authorities could claim small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. where no applicable later clarification had withdrawn that benefit in the relevant jurisdiction. Trade notices issued pursuant to Board instructions were treated as supporting exemption on provisional SSI registration, and a later clarification relied on by Revenue could not be applied without showing that it governed the unit&#039;s State. The cited decisions were followed to confirm eligibility based on provisional registration, and the Revenue&#039;s objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>