<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 672 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101304</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the off-cuts were classified as waste and scrap due to their unusability and characteristics. The decision emphasizes the importance of demonstrating the potential use of materials for classification purposes, requiring evidence to support such claims in disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:57:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 672 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101304</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the off-cuts were classified as waste and scrap due to their unusability and characteristics. The decision emphasizes the importance of demonstrating the potential use of materials for classification purposes, requiring evidence to support such claims in disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>