<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (9) TMI 135 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101303</link>
    <description>Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to revision petitions and requires exclusion of the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the order sought to be revised. Under section 29(2), those limitation provisions apply to a special law unless expressly excluded, and the U.P. Sales Tax Act contained no such exclusion. The exclusion does not depend on whether the copy must accompany the revision petition. Where the original served copy was lost, obtaining a fresh copy was necessary to decide whether revision should be filed and on what grounds. The time spent obtaining that copy was therefore excluded, and the issue was decided against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (9) TMI 135 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101303</link>
      <description>Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to revision petitions and requires exclusion of the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the order sought to be revised. Under section 29(2), those limitation provisions apply to a special law unless expressly excluded, and the U.P. Sales Tax Act contained no such exclusion. The exclusion does not depend on whether the copy must accompany the revision petition. Where the original served copy was lost, obtaining a fresh copy was necessary to decide whether revision should be filed and on what grounds. The time spent obtaining that copy was therefore excluded, and the issue was decided against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>