<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 657 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), NEW DELH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101290</link>
    <description>SSI exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was available even where the generating sets were not specifically endorsed in the provisional SSI registration certificate, as Board clarification and prior tribunal decisions recognised such goods as eligible. Denial of exemption on the separate ground that the registration was only provisional was not sustainable because that objection was outside the scope of the show cause notices. Provisional registration under the industrial registration framework was treated as acceptable SSI registration for exemption purposes, and the duty demand was therefore not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 657 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), NEW DELH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101290</link>
      <description>SSI exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was available even where the generating sets were not specifically endorsed in the provisional SSI registration certificate, as Board clarification and prior tribunal decisions recognised such goods as eligible. Denial of exemption on the separate ground that the registration was only provisional was not sustainable because that objection was outside the scope of the show cause notices. Provisional registration under the industrial registration framework was treated as acceptable SSI registration for exemption purposes, and the duty demand was therefore not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>