<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 632 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101267</link>
    <description>Contravention of a duty-free import scheme by selling duty-free imported goods in the open market justified penal action, and subsequent payment of duty on detection did not warrant deletion of the penalty. The penalty was therefore sustained, but the surrounding circumstances and the excess amount paid over the duty demand were relevant to quantifying the sanction, resulting in reduction of the penalty to Rs. 3 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 632 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101267</link>
      <description>Contravention of a duty-free import scheme by selling duty-free imported goods in the open market justified penal action, and subsequent payment of duty on detection did not warrant deletion of the penalty. The penalty was therefore sustained, but the surrounding circumstances and the excess amount paid over the duty demand were relevant to quantifying the sanction, resulting in reduction of the penalty to Rs. 3 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>