<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 344 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101256</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application as groundless and lacking bona fides, with costs awarded to the respondent. The court upheld the validity of the execution proceedings and sale of the property, concluding that the applicant had no valid grounds to challenge them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:34:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 344 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101256</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application as groundless and lacking bona fides, with costs awarded to the respondent. The court upheld the validity of the execution proceedings and sale of the property, concluding that the applicant had no valid grounds to challenge them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>