<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 294 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101255</link>
    <description>Rule 28(4) of the Company Law Board (Bench) Rules, 1975 applies to appearance before the Bench and not to the initial presentation of papers for institution of proceedings. Rule 12 governs filing by the party or an authorised representative, and an advocate&#039;s vakalath is sufficient authorisation at that stage. The requirement to file a memorandum of appearance in Form No. 4 arises only for hearing before the Bench, not for presentation to the Bench Officer. Accordingly, papers filed through advocates could not be returned for want of a board resolution and Form No. 4, and the return of the papers was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 294 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101255</link>
      <description>Rule 28(4) of the Company Law Board (Bench) Rules, 1975 applies to appearance before the Bench and not to the initial presentation of papers for institution of proceedings. Rule 12 governs filing by the party or an authorised representative, and an advocate&#039;s vakalath is sufficient authorisation at that stage. The requirement to file a memorandum of appearance in Form No. 4 arises only for hearing before the Bench, not for presentation to the Bench Officer. Accordingly, papers filed through advocates could not be returned for want of a board resolution and Form No. 4, and the return of the papers was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>