https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101253 The court upheld the validity of the order replacing a director in a company's board of directors, emphasizing that directors serve at the pleasure of the Governor unless proven mala fide. The court found no evidence of mala fides in the replacement decision and dismissed allegations against a minister for lack of relevance. Additionally, the court deemed the order, issued "by order of the Governor," as compliant with article 18, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs awarded. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:22:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101253 The court upheld the validity of the order replacing a director in a company's board of directors, emphasizing that directors serve at the pleasure of the Governor unless proven mala fide. The court found no evidence of mala fides in the replacement decision and dismissed allegations against a minister for lack of relevance. Additionally, the court deemed the order, issued "by order of the Governor," as compliant with article 18, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 04 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101253