<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 488 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101249</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit waiver and stay of recovery were granted in a central excise dispute concerning classification of conveyor systems and related parts. The Tribunal found that the appellant had raised a substantial prima facie case on both merits and limitation, which justified protection against coercive recovery while the appeal was pending. On that basis, recovery of the disputed duty and penalties was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:16:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 488 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101249</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit waiver and stay of recovery were granted in a central excise dispute concerning classification of conveyor systems and related parts. The Tribunal found that the appellant had raised a substantial prima facie case on both merits and limitation, which justified protection against coercive recovery while the appeal was pending. On that basis, recovery of the disputed duty and penalties was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>