<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 486 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal by M/s. Stainless India Ltd., affirming the decisions of lower authorities. It held that the discount claimed was not known to customers before goods removal, as required by law. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of clear evidence demonstrating that discounts are known to buyers in advance to be deductible from the assessable value of Central Excise goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 486 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal by M/s. Stainless India Ltd., affirming the decisions of lower authorities. It held that the discount claimed was not known to customers before goods removal, as required by law. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of clear evidence demonstrating that discounts are known to buyers in advance to be deductible from the assessable value of Central Excise goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>