<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 340 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101231</link>
    <description>The petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 was dismissed as not maintainable. The court found that the petitioners, being in control of the company, could not claim oppression, and the application under section 398 was premature. The Division Bench upheld this decision, dismissing the special appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 340 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101231</link>
      <description>The petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 was dismissed as not maintainable. The court found that the petitioners, being in control of the company, could not claim oppression, and the application under section 398 was premature. The Division Bench upheld this decision, dismissing the special appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>