<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 474 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101230</link>
    <description>In a dispute over excise valuation, the appellant challenged inclusion of labour cost incurred in replacing tractor parts during the warranty period in the assessable value and sought waiver of pre-deposit on the basis of a strong prima facie case. The CEGAT did not grant full waiver and directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs before the appeal could proceed, making hearing conditional on compliance with the pre-deposit order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 474 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101230</link>
      <description>In a dispute over excise valuation, the appellant challenged inclusion of labour cost incurred in replacing tractor parts during the warranty period in the assessable value and sought waiver of pre-deposit on the basis of a strong prima facie case. The CEGAT did not grant full waiver and directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs before the appeal could proceed, making hearing conditional on compliance with the pre-deposit order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>