https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101227 An adjudication order was found non-speaking because it merely repeated earlier findings without complying with the Tribunal's remand directions to examine each item's liability, correct classification, applicable duty rate and claimed exemption. The reasoning was inadequate because the goods were identified mainly by code numbers without descriptive particulars, and no reasons were given for rejecting the exemption claim. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a de novo speaking order after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:34:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101227 An adjudication order was found non-speaking because it merely repeated earlier findings without complying with the Tribunal's remand directions to examine each item's liability, correct classification, applicable duty rate and claimed exemption. The reasoning was inadequate because the goods were identified mainly by code numbers without descriptive particulars, and no reasons were given for rejecting the exemption claim. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a de novo speaking order after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101227