<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 190 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101224</link>
    <description>Jeera, dhania, panmohuri and methi were examined as to whether they fell within the inclusive definition of oil-seeds under section 14(vi) of the Central Sales Tax Act, which turns on botanical and functional characteristics rather than common parlance alone. Administrative material, including a Government of India communication and notification listing the commodities as oil-seeds, was treated as relevant evidence of their nature and use even though it had no statutory force or binding effect on State authorities. The classification adopted by the Tribunal and affirmed by the High Court was upheld, and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 190 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101224</link>
      <description>Jeera, dhania, panmohuri and methi were examined as to whether they fell within the inclusive definition of oil-seeds under section 14(vi) of the Central Sales Tax Act, which turns on botanical and functional characteristics rather than common parlance alone. Administrative material, including a Government of India communication and notification listing the commodities as oil-seeds, was treated as relevant evidence of their nature and use even though it had no statutory force or binding effect on State authorities. The classification adopted by the Tribunal and affirmed by the High Court was upheld, and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>