https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101220 Leave of the company court to proceed against a company in liquidation is not a condition precedent to filing a suit under section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The provision was treated as substantially in pari materia with section 171 of the Companies Act, 1913, with the added words regarded as explanatory rather than changing the settled legal position. A suit filed without prior leave remains ineffective until permission is obtained, but once leave is granted, the proceeding is treated as effective from the date of grant. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:53:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101220 Leave of the company court to proceed against a company in liquidation is not a condition precedent to filing a suit under section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The provision was treated as substantially in pari materia with section 171 of the Companies Act, 1913, with the added words regarded as explanatory rather than changing the settled legal position. A suit filed without prior leave remains ineffective until permission is obtained, but once leave is granted, the proceeding is treated as effective from the date of grant. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101220