<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 272 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101212</link>
    <description>SC allowed the appeal and declared the workmen entitled to a 16% bonus for 1969. The court found that a wholly owned intermediate company, having no assets or business except transferred shares and receiving only dividends, was effectively a device to reduce the employer&#039;s gross profits. Those dividends must be included in the employer&#039;s gross profits for computing bonus. The appeal was allowed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 272 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101212</link>
      <description>SC allowed the appeal and declared the workmen entitled to a 16% bonus for 1969. The court found that a wholly owned intermediate company, having no assets or business except transferred shares and receiving only dividends, was effectively a device to reduce the employer&#039;s gross profits. Those dividends must be included in the employer&#039;s gross profits for computing bonus. The appeal was allowed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>