<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 291 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101210</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the interpretation of section 309(7) of the Companies Act, stating that renewal within five years is not prohibited. The appeal was dismissed as the resolution increasing remuneration was made more than one year after the original resolution came into force.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:41:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 291 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101210</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the interpretation of section 309(7) of the Companies Act, stating that renewal within five years is not prohibited. The appeal was dismissed as the resolution increasing remuneration was made more than one year after the original resolution came into force.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>