<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 216 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101194</link>
    <description>The court admitted the petition, requiring the company to pay Rs. 30,000 to the petitioner and provide security for the remaining amount within ten days. Failure to comply would result in the order of admission and citation being stayed, with the petition adjourned sine die, allowing revival after the petitioner&#039;s recovery proceedings conclude.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:29:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 216 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101194</link>
      <description>The court admitted the petition, requiring the company to pay Rs. 30,000 to the petitioner and provide security for the remaining amount within ten days. Failure to comply would result in the order of admission and citation being stayed, with the petition adjourned sine die, allowing revival after the petitioner&#039;s recovery proceedings conclude.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>