https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101192 The court dismissed the suit with costs, ruling in favor of the defendant on various issues including jurisdiction, notice of the annual general meeting, and the alleged mala fides of the defendant council. The court found that the defendant was not required to hold elections for all 27 executive committee members and that there was no evidence of mala fides in the dispatch of notices. Additionally, the court held that the plaintiff's delay in serving the injunction and disruptive conduct disentitled her to relief. en-us Wed, 13 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:23:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101192 The court dismissed the suit with costs, ruling in favor of the defendant on various issues including jurisdiction, notice of the annual general meeting, and the alleged mala fides of the defendant council. The court found that the defendant was not required to hold elections for all 27 executive committee members and that there was no evidence of mala fides in the dispatch of notices. Additionally, the court held that the plaintiff's delay in serving the injunction and disruptive conduct disentitled her to relief. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 13 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101192